Specificity

Next Level Mark may have been open to that. You never know!

“My boyfriend was playing my account at the time, and he almost obliged. ;)”

Next Level Mark

  • Anonymous

    Wait, is he saying he’ll pay 1600 points for a nude, or is he asking you to pay 1600 points for a nude? I mean, either way, it’s freaking creepy. But one has the audacity to assume you’d want a nude of him. I’m leaning on the former, but it’s still pretty vague.

    Be more concise, xbox trolls!

  • Jonathan Humphreys

    Either way, probably inadvisable to oblige. There’s no telling whether this pillock’s low age is physical or merely mental, and you’re going to have a bad time if it turns out to be the former. O_O’

  • http://twitter.com/The_T113 The T

    Just to show how dumb I am, I read that as “nude back massage”. Yeah, I don’t know how I did that either.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kroscovius Krista Roscovius

     Definitely inadvisable to oblige, but I don’t deny it would be hilarious XD

  • http://thestrayworld.com/ Rewarp

     The message doesn’t specify nudity of object. I’d have been tempted to send back a picture of Bugs Bunny.

  • Rafael Martins

    Send him that one frame from Fight Club.

  • http://facebook.com/deathbydd DeathbyDD

     Tyler Durden says “NO!” XD

  • http://facebook.com/deathbydd DeathbyDD

    I would never undress my avatar for 1600. No way! She’s fought her way through lots of avatar games and she deserves RESPECT gosh-darn it! >_<

  • WhyleKat

    Not worth it, dude!  Not worth it…

  • http://www.facebook.com/YourD Jordy Den Hartog

    just send a picture of a dog. “He’s not wearing clothes”

  • http://facebook.com/deathbydd DeathbyDD

     Hehehehehehe!

  • http://felizacasano.com/ Feliza

    That would have been hilarious.  Can you imagine the other person’s face?

blog comments powered by Disqus

Recent Comments